Sims

(PS) Petersen v. Sims

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20191:19-cv-00138California1,067 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No. 1:19-cv-00138-DAD-EPG

KYLE PETERSEN, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL,

Plaintiff, DENYING MOTION TO ALLOW OTHER

INDIVIDUALS TO SIGN MOTIONS ON

v. PLAINTIFF’S BEHALF, AND DENYING

WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR

ANTHONY SIMS, JR., et al., ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 16, 23, 24, 25)

17 18 Plaintiff, Kyle Petersen, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 23), motion informing the Court of Plaintiff’s intent to allow other individuals to sign motions on Plaintiff’s behalf (ECF No. 24), and Plaintiff’s motions requesting issuance of subpoenas (ECF Nos. 16, 25). A. Motion to Appoint Counsel Plaintiff requests that the Court appoint counsel to represent him in this action,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.