(PS) Mackintosh v. Lyft, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 ADAM JOHN MACKINTOSH, No. 2:19-cv-1849-MCE-KJN PS 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS, MOTIONS TO v. STRIKE, MOTION TO REMAND, AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS; ORDER LYFT, INC., et al., (ECF Nos. 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, Defendants. 23, 34, and 50) 14 Plaintiff Adam John Mackintosh, who proceeds without counsel, asserts he invented a healthcare–rideshare program that was misappropriated. Plaintiff filed an action in California Superior Court against Defendants Lyft, John Zimmer, Logan Green, Uber Health, Uber Technologies, AH Capital Management, Ben Horowitz, two Benchmark Capital entities, Matt Cohler, Josef Arvin Acebedo, Louis Darnell Pritchett, Jerry Wang, Amy Biddle, and the Better Business Bureau. (ECF No. 1–2.) Plaintiff’s 738–page Complaint lists twenty–nine federal and state law claims, as alleged against all Defendants. (Id. at pp. 88–825.) …