(PS) Mackintosh v. Lyft, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20192:19-cv-01849California9,205 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 ADAM JOHN MACKINTOSH, No. 2:19-cv-1849-MCE-KJN PS 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS, MOTIONS TO v. STRIKE, MOTION TO REMAND, AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS; ORDER LYFT, INC., et al., (ECF Nos. 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, Defendants. 23, 34, and 50) 14 Plaintiff Adam John Mackintosh, who proceeds without counsel, asserts he invented a healthcare–rideshare program that was misappropriated. Plaintiff filed an action in California Superior Court against Defendants Lyft, John Zimmer, Logan Green, Uber Health, Uber Technologies, AH Capital Management, Ben Horowitz, two Benchmark Capital entities, Matt Cohler, Josef Arvin Acebedo, Louis Darnell Pritchett, Jerry Wang, Amy Biddle, and the Better Business Bureau. (ECF No. 1–2.) Plaintiff’s 738–page Complaint lists twenty–nine federal and state law claims, as alleged against all Defendants. (Id. at pp. 88–825.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.