Cudal

(PC) Diaz v. Cudal

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20191:19-cv-01282California1,133 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA DIAZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-01282-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION CUDAL, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER

AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

16 (ECF No. 5)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 I. Background Plaintiff Joshua Diaz (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 18, 2019, the Court issued an order striking Plaintiff’s unsigned complaint and requiring Plaintiff to file a signed complaint within thirty (30) days to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 5.) The Court expressly warned Plaintiff that his failure to comply with the 26 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.