(PC) Villalobos v. Tiggs-Brown, P.A
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 RAMON DANIEL VILLALOBOS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00442-DAD-EPG Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR
v. DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT STEPHEN
SHELLANS, JR., WITH PREJUDICE
ARMENTA TIGGS-BROWN, P.A, et al., Defendants. (ECF No. 23) 16 Plaintiff, Ramon Daniel Villalobos, and Defendants, Armenta Tiggs-Brown and Stephen 18 Shellans, Jr., have filed a stipulation to dismiss Defendant Stephen Shellans, Jr., M.D., with 19 prejudice (ECF No. 23). In light of the stipulation, the case against Defendant Stephan Shellans 20 has ended and the case is dismissed with prejudice only as to Defendant Stephan Shellans. See 91 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The 22 Clerk of the Court is directed to designate the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 23) as terminated.
T IS SO ORDERED.
24 25| Dated: _ November 5, 2019 [see hey UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27