Brennan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAS HEZEKIAH TAFARI, No. 2:17-cv-00113-MCE-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Ras Hezekiah Tafari (“Plaintiff”) seeks reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge’s order, ECF No. 86, denying his Motion to Exclude Defendant Megan Brennan’s (“Defendant”) undisclosed witnesses and additional documents under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(c), ECF No. 76. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion, ECF No. 94, is DENIED. In reviewing a magistrate judge’s determination, the assigned judge shall apply the “clearly erroneous or contrary to law” standard of review set forth in Local Rule 303(f), as specifically authorized by Rule 72(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Under this standard, the Court must accept the magistrate judge’s decision unless it has a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” Concrete Pipe & Prods. of Cal., 27 1 All further references to “Rule” or…