Baughman

(PC) Hubbard v. Baughman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 20192:19-cv-01482California757 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZANE HUBBARD, No. 2:19-cv-1482 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Review of court records reveals that on at least three occasions lawsuits filed by the plaintiff have been dismissed on the grounds that they were frivolous or malicious or failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted: 1. Hubbard v. Flores, No. 1:13-cv-01056 AWI BAM (E.D. Cal.) (dismissed June 30, 2014, for failure to state a claim; no appeal filed). 2. Hubbard v. Mendes, No. 1:13-cv-01078 LJO MJS (E.D. Cal.) (dismissed March 17, 2014, for failure to state a claim; no appeal filed). 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.