Schmuckley
Schmuckley v. Rite Aid Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the No. 2:12-cv-1699-KJM-EFB STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ex rel. LOYD F. SCHMUCKLEY, JR., Plaintiffs, ORDER AFTER HEARING v. RITE AID CORPORATION, Defendant. 17 This case was before the court on October 30, 2019, for hearing on plaintiff-intervenor State of California’s motion to compel defendant Rite Aid Corporation to provide further responses to California’s Request for Production of Documents (“RPD”) numbers 17-38 (ECF No. 249) and defendant Rite Aid’s motion for an extension of time to provide responses to California’s discovery requests and to comply with the court’s July 2, 2019 order (ECF No. 250). California Deputy Attorneys General Emmanuel Salazar and Bernice Yew appeared on behalf of California. Attorney Benjamin Smith appeared on behalf of Rite Aid. As discussed at the hearing, Rite Aid has produced some, but not all, of the documents responsive to California’s RPD Nos. 17-38. With respect to those…