(PC) Randolph v. CSP Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL RANDOLPH, No. 2:19-cv-01670 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER and FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
CSP SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 By an order filed September 4, 2019, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma 17 pauperis application or pay the filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so 18 would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now 19 expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall assign a district 21 judge to this action. 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 23 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may…