Roy Jackson, Jr. v. Johnson & Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 20192:19-cv-01968California625 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL FILED

Nov 05, 2019

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION CLERK, US. DISTRICT COURT

IN RE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM

POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES

PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2738

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —175)

On October 4, 2016, the Panel transferred 10 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 220 F.Supp.3d 1356 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 1,522 additional action(s) have been transferred to the District of New Jersey. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Freda L. Wolfson. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the District of New Jersey and assigned to Judge Wolfson. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.