Schrffenberg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUAN MONTENEGRO, ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-00422-AWI-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. ) FOR RECONSIDERATION

DR. SCHRFFENBERG, et.al., ) [ECF No. 14] ) Defendants. ) ) )

On September 27, 2017, the instant action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983, was dismissed for failure to comply with a court order and for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief, and judgment was entered. (ECF Nos. 12, 13.) On September 27, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion “to be heard for failure to comply with a court order.” The Court construes Plaintiff’s motion as a Rule 60 motion for relief. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) governs relief from orders of the district court. The Rule permits a district court to relieve a party from a final order or judgment on grounds of: “(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence. .…