King
(PC) Sharp v. King
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
I. BACKGROUND
19 Anthony A. Sharp (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights 20 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 13, 2018, Plaintiff filed the Complaint 21 commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) 22 On June 28, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations, 23 recommending that Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status be revoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) 24 and Plaintiff be required to pay the filing fee in full for this action within thirty days. (ECF No. 25 10.) On August 26, 2019, the undersigned adopted the findings and recommendations in full. 26 (ECF No. 12.) On September 18, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration. (ECF No. 27 13.) 28 II. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION A. Legal Standard When filing a motion for reconsideration, Local Rule 230(j) requires a party to show the “new or different facts or circumstances claimed to exist which did not exist or were not shown upon such prior motion, or what other grounds exist for the motion.” L. R. 230(j). “A motion for reconsideration should not be granted, absent highly unusual circumstances, unless the district 7…