(SS) Harris v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20191:19-cv-00515California469 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MISTY LYNN HARRIS, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-0515- JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER TO DEFENDANT TO SHOW CAUSE )

WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

v. ) ) FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) COURT’S ORDER ) Defendant. ) )

Misty Lynn Harris seeks judicial review of a decision to denying her application for Social Security benefits. (Doc. 1) On May 1, 2019, the Court issued its Scheduling Order, setting forth the applicable deadlines. (Doc. 9) Plaintiff served a confidential letter brief upon Defendant on September 30, 2019. (Doc. 13) Pursuant to the terms of the Scheduling Order, within thirty-five days of the date of service of the confidential letter brief, the Commissioner was to serve a response and file a proof of service. (Doc. 9 at 2) To date, the Commissioner has not filed a proof of service indicating a response was served upon Plaintiff. In addition, the Commissioner did not request an extension of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.