Badger

(PC) Bland v. Badger

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20191:19-cv-00702California498 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA DAVIS BLAND, 1:19-cv-00702-DAD-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. SECOND MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

D. BADGER, et al.

(ECF No. 22) Defendants.

Plaintiff, Joshua D. Bland, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 3, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for the appointment of counsel, which the Court denied. (ECF Nos. 6, 10). The Court subsequently screened Plaintiff’s complaint and the case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s claims for Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious risk of harm against M. Flores and M. Stane; for Eighth Amendment harassment against M. Flores; and for conspiracy against M. Flores and M. Stane (ECF No. 11). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 22). Plaintiff does not have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.