Patel

(PS) Johnson v. Patel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20192:14-cv-02052California1,777 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT JOHNSON, No. 2:14-cv-2052 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. MIKE PATEL, Defendant. 16 STATUS & PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTAINS IMPORTANT DATES WHICH THE COURT WILL STRICTLY ENFORCE AND WITH WHICH ALL COUNSEL AND PARTIES MUST COMPLY. A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF MONETARY AND ALL OTHER SANCTIONS WITHIN THE POWER OF THE COURT, INCLUDING DISMISSAL OR AN ORDER OF JUDGMENT. Pursuant to court order, a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference was held in this action on November 1, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned. Attorney Bradley Smith appeared //// 27 1 Defendant is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). on behalf of the plaintiff. Mike Patel appeared telephonically on his own behalf. After hearing, 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.