Spearman

(HC) Sermeno v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20192:14-cv-02729California486 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY ALTAMIRANO SERMENO, No. 2:14-cv-2729 JAM DB P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS M.E. SPEARMAN, Respondent. 16 On July 24, 2019, a court order was served at petitioner’s address of record. (ECF No. 107). The order directed respondent to file a response to petitioner’s petition within sixty days. (See id. at 3). It also directed petitioner to file either a reply or an opposition within thirty days of respondent filing a response. (See id. at 3-4). On August 2, 2019, the court’s order served on petitioner was returned to the court as undeliverable. A subsequent notice of case reassignment served on petitioner on August 28, 2019 (see ECF No. 111), was also returned to the court as undeliverable on September 16, 2019. Since these orders were returned, petitioner has not filed a notice of change of address with the court. On September 23, 2019, respondent filed an answer to the petition and lodged the state 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.