(PS) Awadan v. Reebok Corporate Headquarter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FAIZAL AWADAN, SHAINAZ No. 2: 17-cv-01148-KJM-AC

AWADAN,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.

REEBOK CORPORATE

HEADQUARTER, Defendant. 17 On September 27, 2019, the court issued an order requiring the parties to meet and confer regarding the amount in controversy and file a joint status report either stipulating to remand the case or explaining why the case should not be remanded for lack of jurisdiction. The parties filed separate status reports. The court now REMANDS the case to Solano County Superior Court on its own motion. I. Factual Background This case arises from a dispute over the return of two pairs of shoes to a Reebok store, in which Reebok employees refused to allow plaintiff Shainaz Awadan to return two pairs of shoes, and ultimately kept the shoes without refunding her the purchase price. See generally, Compl., ECF No. 1-2, at 6–7. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint in Solano County Superior…