(PS) Alford v. Supreme Court State of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MORRIS DAY aka RICKEY LOUIS No. 2:19-cv-1320 JAM DB PS

ALFORD,

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. SUPREME COURT STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 16 Defendants. 18 Plaintiff, Rickey Alford is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) Therein, plaintiff complains about “female white supremacist Neo-Nazi-Ku Kluk Klans.” (Compl. (ECF No. 1) at 1-2.) The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiff’s complaint is deficient. Accordingly, for the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed…