UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —164)

On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 214 F.Supp.3d 1346 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 1,979 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Chhabria. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

Inasmuch as no objection is is ied time, the < VL Z AU —_— | hereby certify that the annexed |. Nov 07, 2019 instrument is a true and correct ¢opy of the original on file in my office. Ves, ow Ie por

ATTEST:

SUSAN Y. SOONG

Clerk, U.S. District Court Northern District of Califomia

Date:.November 7, 2019

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

SCHEDULE CTO−164 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA EASTERN

CAE 1 19−01458 Minson et al v. Monsanto Company

DELAWARE

DE 1 19−01760 Miller et al v. Monsanto Company DE 1 19−01768 Miller et al v. Monsanto Company DE 1 19−01769 Brokaw v. Monsanto Company

FLORIDA MIDDLE

FLM 8 19−02486 Wittkamper v. Monsanto Company

FLORIDA SOUTHERN

FLS 1 19−24070 Thal v. Monsanto Company

ILLINOIS NORTHERN

ILN 1 19−06420 Gonzalez v. Monsanto Company, Inc.

LOUISIANA WESTERN

LAW 3 19−01346 Long v. Monsanto Co

MINNESOTA

MN 0 19−02729 Tschetter v. Monsanto Company

MISSOURI EASTERN

MOE 4 19−02253 Farkas v. Monsanto Company

NEW HAMPSHIRE

NEW MEXICO

NM 2 19−00970 Davis v. Monsanto Company

NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN

NCW 5 19−00127 Swedlund v. Monsanto Company

OHIO NORTHERN

OHN 4 19−02347 Riley v. Monsanto Company

OHIO SOUTHERN

OHS 1 19−00839 Derifield v. Monsanto Company

SOUTH CAROLINA

SC 2 19−02791 Miller et al v. Monsanto Company SC 7 19−02735 Stephens v. Monsanto Company

WASHINGTON EASTERN

WAE 2 19−00345 Sanders et al v. Monsanto Company WAE 4 19−05246 Stolz v. Monsanto Company

WASHINGTON WESTERN

WAW 2 19−01573 Tostenrude v. Monsanto Company