Roe

Zoom Imaging Solutions, Inc. v. Roe

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20192:19-cv-01544California7,502 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 ZOOM IMAGING SOLUTIONS, INC., No. 2:19-cv-01544-WBS-KJN Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM & ORDER RE: MOTION

TO DISMISS

EDWARD ROE; MAXWELL RAMSAY; JON

CROSSEN; CORINNE FUEREST; ANDREW

ALSWEET; KEVIN TOON; JASON

PEEBLER; ABIGAIL NEAL; POWER

BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY LLC; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 18 Defendants.

20 ----oo0oo---- 21 Plaintiff Zoom Imaging Solutions, Inc. (“Zoom”) brings this action against defendants Edward Roe, Maxwell Ramsay, Jon Crossen, Corinne Fuerest, Andrew Alsweet, Kevin Toon, Jason Peebler, Abigail Neal, Power Business Technology LLC (“Power”), and Does 1 through 100, alleging that defendants accessed and used Zoom’s confidential information to build and develop competitor Power’s business, in violation of defendants’ employment agreements, as well as state and federal law. Before the court is defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (Docket No. 23.) I. Relevant Allegations 4…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.