Bouldin

(PC) Corral v. Bouldin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20192:18-cv-01629California1,307 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DYLAN SCOTT CORRAL, No. 2:18-cv-1629 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND LT. BOULDIN, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 20, 2019, the court screened plaintiff’s amended complaint as the court is required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The amended complaint was dismissed with leave to file a second amended complaint. In the screening order, plaintiff was informed as follows: Plaintiff asserts that on several separate occasions while he was housed at the Glenn County Jail, he was disciplined in the form of loss of “privileges” such as family visits and “canteen” without being provided copies of “incident reports” more than 24 hours before disciplinary hearings. Plaintiff does not indicate why he was disciplined nor the process…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.