BMO Harris Bank, N.A. v. Billan-Pahal Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20191:19-cv-00140California227 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A., Case No. 1:19-cv-00140-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS GURDEEP

10] v. BILLAN, RANJODH BILLAN, AND

BILLAN-PAHAL CORPORATION

WITHOUT PREJUDICE BILLAN-PAHAL CORPORATION, et al., (ECF No. 19) Defendants. 13 14 On November 8, 2019, Plaintiff, BMO Harris Bank, N.A., filed a notice of voluntary 16 dismissal without prejudice of Defendants Gurdeep Billan, Ranjodh Billan, and Billan-Pahal 17 Corporation. (ECF No. 19.) Defendants Gurdeep Billan, Ranjodh Billan, and Billan-Pahal 1g Corporation have not filed either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, in 19 light of the notice, the case against Defendants Gurdeep Billan, Ranjodh Billan, and Billan-Pahal 29 Corporation has ended and they are dismissed from this action without prejudice. See Fed. R. 91 Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.