Shulkin

(PS) Channel v. Shulkin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20192:18-cv-02414California465 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TASHIA CHANNEL, No. 2:18-cv-02414-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER DAVID J. SHULKIN, et al., Defendants. 15 The court is in receipt of plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel. ECF No. 50. Plaintiff is bringing her civil case as a self-represented litigant proceeding in forma pauperis. ECF No. 6. I. Motion Plaintiff requests that the court appoint counsel, asserting she has sought counsel on her own but has been unable to find representation due to income and time limits. ECF No. 50 at 2. Plaintiff stated that several attorneys have turned down her case but told her that her civil rights were violated. Id. Plaintiff asserts that an attorney would help her understand the court processes, including why defendants’ reply brief to their motion to dismiss was sent out late such that plaintiff would not have time to reply. Id. II. Analysis In civil cases,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.