(PS) Manning v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20192:19-cv-00494California494 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY L. MANNING, No. 2:19-cv-00494-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

VETERANS AFFAIRS,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Anthony L. Manning (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, has filed this action pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On September 20, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 29.) On September 24, 2019, Plaintiff filed his “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” (ECF No. 30.) On October 8, 2019, Defendant the United States1 /// 26 The Court notes Plaintiff initially sued the United States Department of Veterans Affairs but the proper defendant under the FTCA in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.