Becker

(PS) McCoy v. Becker

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20192:19-cv-00680California354 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES R. MCCOY, No. 2:19-cv-00680-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER BECKER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff James R. McCoy (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 11, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 7.) No objections to the Findings and Recommendations have been filed. Although it appears from the file that Plaintiff’s copy of the Findings and Recommendations was returned, Plaintiff was properly served. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the Court apprised of his current address at all times. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.