Roe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ZOOM IMAGING SOLUTIONS, INC., No. 2:19–cv–1544–WBS–KJN 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION v. TO STAY DISCOVERY 13 EDWARD ROE, et al., (ECF No. 37) 14 Defendants. 15 This case concerns the alleged breach of fiduciary duties and theft of confidential information by Defendant Edward Roe and other ex–employees upon their exit from Plaintiff Zoom’s employ. (See ECF No. 1.) On November 8, 2019, District Judge Shubb dismissed the majority of Plaintiff’s claims and granted leave to amend. (ECF No. 53.) Currently before the Court is Defendant Power Business Technology’s Motion to Stay Discovery, set for a hearing on November 14, 2019. (ECF No. 37.) Defendant maintains that a stay should be imposed because Plaintiff has no operative complaint, Defendant anticipates filing another motion to dismiss, and formal discovery has yet to begin. (See ECF No. 56.) Plaintiff disagrees, arguing that because several of its claims against Defendant…