Foulk

(PC) Burton v. Foulk

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20192:13-cv-02123California332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HARRISON BURTON, No. 2:13-cv-2123 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER F. FOULK, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 25, 2019, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 44). Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 46). In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.