Matevousian

(PC) Benanti v. Matevousian

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20191:17-cv-01556California734 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL BENANTI, ) Case No. 1:17-cv-01556-LJO-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S THIRD v. ) MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, AND

DENYING SECOND MOTION FOR COPY OF

) MATEVOUSIAN, DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT ) Defendants. ) [ECF Nos. 78, 79] ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Michael Benanti is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s third motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and Plaintiff’s second motion for a copy of the entire deposition transcript, filed November 14, 2019. Both of Plaintiff’s motions are self-dated as served on November 7, 2019. On the basis of good cause, the Court will grant Plaintiff an extension of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.