Murray
Murray v. Scelzi Enterprises, Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 RODERICK MURRAY, an individual, on No. 1:18-cv-01492-LJO-SKO behalf of the State of California, as a private attorney general, and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff, REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS
v. ACTION SETTLEMENT SCELZI ENTERPRISES, INC., a (Doc. 23) California Corporation; and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, Defendant.
20 On August 27, 2019, Plaintiff Roderick Murray, individually and on behalf of all others 21 similarly situated (“Plaintiff”), filed an unopposed motion for preliminary approval of a class action 22 settlement. (Doc. 23.) The motion was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge for findings 23 and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The undersigned reviewed Plaintiff’s papers 24 and all supporting material and found the matter suitable for decision without oral argument 25 pursuant to U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California’s Local Rule 230(g). The…