Castro

Castro v. Clovis Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20191:19-cv-00821California3,834 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDY E. CASTRO, No. 1:19-cv-00821-DAD-SKO Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART

DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

CITY OF CLOVIS; et al., AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO

AMEND

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 8, 9)

17 This matter is before the court on the motions to dismiss filed on behalf of defendant City of Clovis (the “City”) and defendants Clovis Unified School District (“CUSD”), Andrew Bolls, and Stephanie Hanks (collectively, the “CSUD defendants”). (Doc. Nos. 8, 9.) A hearing on the motions was held on October 1, 2019. Plaintiff Andy E. Castro appeared pro se, attorney Gregory Myers appeared telephonically on behalf of the City of Clovis, and attorney Ryan Porte appeared on behalf of defendants CUSD, Bolls, and Hanks. The court has considered the parties’ briefing and heard from the parties, and for the reasons set forth below, will grant the City’s motion in its entirety and grant the CUSD defendants’ motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.