Acharya

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD GOMEZ, No. 2:17-cv-2407 MCE CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACHARYA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has filed another motion for an extension of time. (ECF No. 46.) His previous motion was denied because he did not identify which deadline he wanted to extend or how long of an extension he was seeking. (ECF No. 45.) Though the instant motion states that plaintiff is seeking a twenty-eight-day extension, plaintiff has once again failed to identify what deadline he wants extended. The motion will therefore be denied. If plaintiff files another motion for extension, he needs to tell the court what he wants more time to do. Plaintiff has also filed a motion requesting an expert witness to verify his diagnosis. (ECF No. 47.) Federal Rule of Evidence 706 authorizes the appointment of a neutral expert witness, with…