Rose

(PC) Anderson v. Rose

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20192:18-cv-01216California632 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TUANJA EDWARD ANDERSON, No. 2:18-cv-1216 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

C. ROSE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. On October 4, 2019, the district court revoked plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status and ordered plaintiff to pay the $400.00 filing fee within 21 days. Such deadline has now passed, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee. Therefore, this action should be dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). On October 17, 2019, plaintiff filed a request that he not be charged for the court’s filing fee in light of the district court’s order revoking plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status, and seeks a refund of the $5.00 paid to date. All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.