Garafalo

(PC) Belyew v. Garafalo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20192:19-cv-00837California339 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LISA BELYEW, No. 2:19-cv-0837 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GARAFALO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 29, 2019, the undersigned recommended that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied because plaintiff accrued three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) prior to filing the present action. (ECF No. 9.) On October 2, 2019, the district judge assigned to this action adopted the findings and recommendations and directed plaintiff to pay filing fee within thirty days or face dismissal of the case. (ECF No. 10.) Those thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to the court’s orders. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.