Lizarraga

(HC) Balzarini v. Lizarraga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20192:19-cv-01199California1,294 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ST. MICHAEL BALZARINI, No. 2:19-cv-01199 GGH P Petitioner, v. ORDER JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner is presently incarcerated at California Institution for Men in San Bernardino County. Petitioner filed this action in the Eastern District on June 28, 2019, complaining about a disciplinary conviction with loss of time credits. ECF No. 1. After attempting twice to have petitioner set forth understandable, concise claims, and after having advised petitioner of the differences between habeas petitions and 42 U.S.C. §1983 civil rights actions, petitioner filed a “Second Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint” purporting to set forth a civil rights claim. See ECF Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10. However, the entire substance of the “complaint” is an attack on the validity of the disciplinary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.