Sherman

I. Background

18 Plaintiff Matthew Andrew Davis is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 19 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 20 On September 25, 2019, the Court found that Plaintiff’s first amended 21 complaint failed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failed to 22 state any cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 15.) The Court granted Plaintiff 23 thirty days, running from the date of service of the order, to file either a second 24 amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal. (Id. at 16.) Plaintiff was

1 As noted in the Court’s December 28, 2018 screening order, Plaintiff asserts that he is visually impaired and requires large print documents in order to be able to 27 read. As an accommodation, the Court is providing this order in large print. 28 expressly warned that, if he failed to comply with the Court’s order, the Court would recommend to the District Judge that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to obey a court order. (Id. at 16.) The allotted time period for Plaintiff to file either a second amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal…