Wakabayashi

(PC) Lovell v. Wakabayashi

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20192:19-cv-01555California503 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID ANTHONY LOVELL II, No. 2:19-cv-1555 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS N. WAKABAYASHI, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which challenges conditions of his prior confinement in the Solano County Jail. This action is referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c). By order filed September 25, 2019, this court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and found that it states cognizable claims against defendants Guzman, Greiner and Wakabayashi, but not against a nurse identified only as “Claudine.” See ECF No. 8 at 4-6. The court provided plaintiff the options of (1) proceeding on his original complaint against all of the defendants except Claudine, or (2) filing a First Amended Complaint. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.