(PC) Nelson v. City of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES NELSON, JR., No. 2:19-cv-1841 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER and SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c). On September 25, 2019, this court granted plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis, found on screening that the complaint was not suitable for service, and granted plaintiff leave to file a First Amended Complaint (FAC) within thirty days. See ECF No. 4. Plaintiff was informed that “[f]ailure to timely file a FAC will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.” Id. at 7. More than thirty days have passed, but plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.…