Akabike

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALVARO QUEZADA, Case No.: 1:18-cv-00797-DAD-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

TO DISMISS ACTION

v. (Doc. 22) SHERMAN, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

16 Mr. Quezada alleges that the defendants failed to provide him adequate medical care and accommodation and retaliated against him because he engaged in protected conduct. (Doc. 22). In his original complaint and first amended complaint, (Docs. 1, 15), the Court found that Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim for relief. (Docs. 13, 19.) The Court provided Plaintiff with the pleading requirements and legal standards for his alleged claims and granted him leave to amend. (Id.) Despite these opportunities, Plaintiff still fails to state a cognizable claim in his second amended complaint (“SAC”). The Court thus finds that Plaintiff is unable to cure the deficiencies in his pleading, see Akhtar v. Mesa, 698 F.3d 1202, 1212-13 (9th Cir. 2012), and recommends that this…