Winn-Reed

(PC) Nible v. Winn-Reed

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20191:19-cv-00340California1,241 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM NIBLE, Case No. 1:19-cv-00340-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

PAY FILING FEE AND FAILURE TO OBEY

S. WINN-REED, et al., COURT ORDER Defendants. (ECF No. 13) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 17 Plaintiff William Nible is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on March 14, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) On March 14, 2019, Plaintiff filed his first application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) However, since the application did not include Plaintiff’s original signature, the Court determined that Plaintiff’s application was deficient. On March 15, 2019, the Court ordered Plaintiff to either submit a new application to proceed in forma pauperis that included Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.