Huckleberry

(PC) Metcalf v. Huckleberry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20191:19-cv-00809California1,580 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DENZELL MAGIC METCALF, Case No. 1:19-cv-00809-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION C. HUCKLEBERRY, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN

Defendants. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS (ECF No. 10) FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE 18 Plaintiff Denzell Magic Metcalf (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 11, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and directed him to either file a first amended complaint or notify the Court of his willingness to proceed on certain cognizable claims. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on November 15, 2019, is currently before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 10) I. Screening Requirement and Standard …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.