Estate of Tyler S. Rushing v. AG Private Protection, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20192:18-cv-01692California1,680 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ESTATE OF TYLER S. RUSHING, No. 2:18-cv-01692-MCE-AC et al., 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.

AG PRIVATE PROTECTION, INC.,

et al., Defendants. 17 By way of this action, Plaintiffs seek to recover for injuries sustained as a result of a fatal altercation between Tyler S. Rushing (“Decedent”) and various named Defendants, which include employees of a private security firm as well as members of the Chico Police Department and the Butte County Sheriff’s Office (generally referred to as “Defendants”). Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Adjudication (ECF No. 23) as to the discrete issue of whether one Defendant, Officer /// /// 26 1 Given this Court’s disproportionately high case load, and in the interest of conserving judicial 27 resources and expediting a decision in this case, the Court will not recount details with which the parties are intimately familiar. To be clear, the Court has considered all evidence and arguments in the record,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.