Winkfield

(PC) Belmonte v. Winkfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20192:19-cv-01189California1,694 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL BELMONTE, No. 2:19-cv-1189 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER WINKFIELD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before this court for review are plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) and four supplements. See ECF Nos. 11-15. For the reasons stated below, the court will provide plaintiff with a second opportunity to amend his complaint. Plaintiff will be directed to incorporate the relevant information in the supplements into his second amended complaint (“SAC”) so that all allegations are contained in a single document. I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff’s original complaint was filed on June 27, 2019. ECF No. 1. On July 31, 2019, the court screened…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.