Roanasios

(PS)Alfaro Brittany v. Roanasios

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20192:19-cv-02064California1,042 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHALLA C. ALFARO BRITTANY, No. 2:19-cv-2064-JAM-KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

v. DONNA S. ROANASIOS, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against Defendant alleging a violation of “sponership [sic] civil rights act other product liability.” (See ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (See ECF No. 2) The Court granted Plaintiff’s IFP request, and dismissed the complaint with leave to amend for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff was given 21 days to amend or file a statement of non–opposition, and was warned that a failure to do so by the required deadline “may result in the imposition of sanctions, including potential dismissal of the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).” More than 21 days have passed without a response from Plaintiff. Eastern District Local Rule 183(a)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.