Torres

(PC) Solomon v. Torres

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20191:18-cv-00615California557 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAXINE M. SOLOMON, Case No. 1:18-cv-00615-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ADD

DEFENDANT

v. (ECF No. 13) S. TORRES, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Maxine M. Solomon (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to add a defendant to this action, filed on March 12, 2019, concurrent with the filing of her second amended complaint. (ECF No. 13.) In her motion, Plaintiff seeks to add Officer Rubacuiva to this action based on allegations of threats made on March 7, 2019. The Court construes Plaintiff’s motion as one to supplement the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(d). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(d) states, “[o]n motion and reasonable notice, the court may, on just terms, permit a party to serve a supplemental pleading setting out any transaction, occurrence,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.