Frauenheim

(HC) Lemmon v. Frauenheim

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20192:17-cv-01639California338 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN FRANK LEMMON, No. 2:17-cv-1639 KJM KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER SCOTT FRAUNHEIM, Warden, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 12, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On August 7, 2019, petitioner was granted until August 25, 2019, to file objections. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.