Baughman

(PC) Goods v. Baughman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20192:18-cv-00732California1,086 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY GOODS, No. 2:18-cv-0732-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After dismissal of the original complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (ECF No. 5), plaintiff filed an amended complaint (ECF No. 10) and the court must screen it. Congress mandates that district courts engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of the complaint, if the complaint “is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” Id. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.