Jaime

(HC) Robben v. Jaime

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20192:18-cv-02545California1,267 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TODD CHRISTIAN ROBBEN, No. 2:18-cv-2545 KJM AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER GEORGE JAIME, Warden, Respondent. 15 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 6, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. On June 28, 2019, petitioner timely1 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 38. He filed supplements to those objections on July 1, 2019 and July 26, 2019. ECF Nos. 39, 40. He has also filed a request for entry of default against respondent, ECF No. 35, and a motion to disqualify both the undersigned and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.