Rojas

(PC) Martinez v. Rojas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20191:16-cv-01467California402 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:16-cv-01467-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-

v. OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR

F. ROJAS, et al., FAILURE TO EXHAUST

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

Defendants. (ECF No. 52)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Antonio Martinez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 10, 2019, Defendant F. Rojas filed a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (ECF No. 52.) Plaintiff was provided with notice of the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir.1988); Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411–12 (9th Cir.1988). (ECF No. 52-1.) On October 7, 2019, Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.