(PC) Freeman v. St. Clair

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20191:18-cv-00621California1,036 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 LARRY FREEMAN, Case No. 1:18-cv-00621-AWI-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REOPENING CASE v. (ECF No. 14) ST. CLAIR, et al., Defendants. 14 Plaintiff Larry Freeman (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 24, 2019, the assigned Magistrate Judge granted Plaintiff leave to file a first amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff was expressly warned that if he failed to file an amended complaint in compliance with the Court’s order, this action would be dismissed for failure to state a claim and failure to obey a court order. (Id. at 12.) On June 11, 2019, following Plaintiff’s failure to communicate with the Court, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations recommending dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim, failure to obey a Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.