Pfeiffer

(PC) Struggs v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20191:18-cv-01336California3,716 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CEDRIC LYNN STRUGGS, 1:18-cv-01336-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF

vs. RULE 8(a), WITH LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 1.) C. PFEIFFER, et al.,

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE

Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT NOT

EXCEEDING 25 PAGES

19 I. BACKGROUND Cedric Lynn Struggs (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 27, 2018, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff has paid the $400.00 filing fee in full. (ECF No. 7.) On September 25, 2019, the court screened the Complaint and dismissed it for failure to state a claim and for violation of Rule 18 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 16.) On November 15, 2019, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint which is now before the court for screening. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.