McConnly

(PC) Blueford v. McConnly

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20191:19-cv-00618California1,024 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JAVAR LESTER BLUEFORD, Case No. 1:19-cv-00618-LJO-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS DISMISSING

v. ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE

DR. MCCONNLY, (ECF Nos. 18, 19, 20) Defendant. 14 Plaintiff Javar L. Blueford is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 7, 2019, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that, based upon the dates of the events in this action, the date of filing the complaint, and Plaintiff’s own allegations, there is no indication that Plaintiff pursued his appeal beyond the first level and therefore, failed to exhaust administrative remedies. (ECF No. 18.) The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.